News:

Welcome to the Astral Pulse 2.0!

If you're looking for your Journal, I've created a central sub forum for them here: https://www.astralpulse.com/forums/dream-and-projection-journals/



Scientific Theories Debunked?

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lionheart

 http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/08/the-most-bonkers-scientific-theories-and-why-you-should-be-thankful-for-them/

I thought you guys might get a kick out of this article. It does have some very interesting facts and items though.  :-)

Volgerle


Astralzombie

Homeopathy is the biggie that stands out to me. Science can easily verify a lot of its validity if their wasn't financial money telling them not to (Phizer, Wyeth). To put this in the same debunked category as sheep growing from a tree is an obvious attempt to discredit something that works for millions of people and has been an effective ploy for many other things.

I don't care what science says, I know the sky is blue because smurfs like to dance in the clouds. The sun reflects off of them and..... You're all intelligent, I'm sure you know the rest.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
Mark Twain

Lionheart

Quote from: Volgerle on August 10, 2013, 09:27:49
too lazy to write it again, so I give a link to what I wrote here:

http://www.astraldynamics.com.au/showthread.php?16329-9-Shades-of-Gray&p=123022#post123022

:-(
Great article Volgerle!  :-)

I agree with everything you said there.

Lionheart

#4
Quote from: Astralzombie on August 10, 2013, 10:55:09
To put this in the same debunked category as sheep growing from a tree is an obvious attempt to discredit something that works for millions of people and has been an effective ploy for many other things.
Unfortunately that's what Debunkers do. They just mass everything together under the same "label" and hope no one notices!  :-P

They have been  doing the same thing with UFO sightings for years. You will find a instance from a credible source, like a military General etc. and they debunk it because they have proven that some kid with CGI knowledge, made up fake video. To them, they have proved the kid's was a fake, so the General's is as well.

Lionheart

#5
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-M-vnmejwXo&feature=youtu.be

John Cleese to the rescue, lol!  :-D He has an explanation for everything!  :wink:

Case in point! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G_zSos8w_I

Szaxx

So knowing you know you know, is knowing enough of what you need to know, so you do know what you know.
Therefore not knowing and thinking you know you know is like not knowing but having a guess anyway. Those in the know, know you don't know you know you know, so tell you to shut up and make a cup of tea.

Perfect sense to me.

Nice find Lion.
There's far more where the eye can't see.
Close your eyes and open your mind.

Stillwater

The ideas discussed in that article aren't really "science" per se, but rather superstitions or medieval myths or random speculations of antique peoples.

But yes, there are some need tidbits.

The "tree-wool" thing I can vouch for firsthand, because that is the German name for cotton, and I think the source of those mistranslations.
"The Gardener is but a dream of the Garden."

-Unattributed Zen monastic