.

[Jenadots]

Yes, he certainly is a "doom and gloomer".  He has also predicted that by the time the war with China is over, 5 billion of us will have died of something.  

Consider, however, that the future is an ever-changing thing.  Enough minds focusing on alternatives to his vision of the future, would be enough to change it.  Enough minds focusing on the disasters he predicts, can bring them about.  

The world is a very dangerous place today, and likely to become more dangerous as various terrorist groups expand, and perhaps join forces.  Yet who could have predicted how this country reacted in the days following the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings.  There were no riots, no demands for nuking someone, no burning of Mosques.  Yes, a few acts of nastiness but overall the weeks that followed were filled with prayers and acts of charity and kindness.

We get what we focus on.  I hope that enough of us can focus on healing the earth and the spirit of mankind to avoid some of what he is predicting.  Perhaps, in that way, we collectively can build a more positive, less disastrous future for us all.

Peace.

[Tayesin]

Hi All.

Paul, thank you for that interesting info, some of it fits nicely with what I have been shown and the rest doesn't.  But, that should be no surprise..LOL.

Jenadots, well said and your sentiments are echoed in groups all around this planet.  But we must realise that the Earth has it's own great cycles of change and upheavals, these things are regularly occuring natural events.  Much like a snake shedding it's skin.  

There are many things that we can effect with united thought, but, the Earth cycle events to come are not one of them.  Although we may be able to lessen the impact on ourselves by maintaining awareness.

Last but not least, Doom and Gloom is a perceptional Judgement.  After the many visions and other sights that I was given, I fell into the rut and was very upset about what I perceived to be huge losses.  This lasted one year.  After which I realised that the opposite was actually true.  Sure many people will die, but they are only being freed from the chains of the flesh, and that in itself is not a bad thing.  I realised that not only do we stand were the old ways will come to an end, but the new will blossom forth from the ashes of the old.  So the events to come are the death of the old and the birthing of the new!!  We must all choose how we will see it, and therefore how it will effect our understanding and abilities to adjust.

Love always.[]

[no_leaf_clover]

Ahh... I need time to move to Ireland before all this takes place, or anywhere besides the US, really. We draw too much negative attention to ourselves, and 2005 is too near a time. I'm going to have to move and wait for Nibiru, which will apparently be around in 2034. Sounds like a plan to me. Too bad all that bs has to happen in between, but at least we take those communist buttheads (the Chinese government, not necessarily Chinese Citizens)..

[hashpuppet]

what radio station and time is this guy on, its  interesting, ill be watching these 10 days to see if they find the weapons and declare war, if they dont ill take it as bull.

[hashpuppet]

im glad that this war with red china will go from alaska to the mid us, i live on the east coast and the east coast is the place that is usually said to be wiped out first, hehee maybe ill stay here and prepare. I wonder how useful our psychic powers will really be when it comes down to it, lets work for 5 years and then give people headaches.

[MJ-12]

as

[shadowatcher]

THE SHAMELESS PSYCHIC AND HIS PROPHECY OF LIES



http://www.ufowatchdog.com/morton1.html

[shadowatcher]

also....


http://www.ufowatchdog.com/bell.html


You should check up on who you gush about. Both Art Bell and Sean Morton are total Dirtbags.

[shadowatcher]

Guys, Im really sorry to break this to you but...Hes a dirtbag, a fake, and a loser...Please read the eniter Expose' on him before posting again in this topic.

[no_leaf_clover]

The page on Morton is fair enough, but the one on Bell makes me think worse things of the webmasters than 'dirtbags'.. Those quotes are totally out of context, I'm sure. Art Bell is an open-minded and educated man, and saying he's just out for money or ratings is utter bovine excrement. If you ever listened to his shows (he's retired now), you could tell he was actually interested in what he was doing and enjoyed it (given that he believed what his guests were saying). That's really all that matters, isn't it?

[shadowatcher]

OK, admittedly they were unfair about Art Bell...But even that doesnt make up for the fact that Sean David Morton is a COMPLETE fraud! He is a total DIRTBAG! Art Bell is ok....

[cainam_nazier]

Art Bell has always been in search of the truth in what ever form it takes.  Have you ever heard what he does to people he doesn't believe or can't seem to back up anything they say?  It's brutal.  He has had people on his show before that have turned out to be total fakes.  He does an excellent job of cutting up a persons ideas and looking at all the pieces to see if they fit.  He is also not afraid to share his opinion on those ideas either.  It's not a pretty sight when he gets a hold of some who doesn't have all thier facts together.

[MJ-12]

jk

[shadowatcher]

Sean Morton is the most horrible person Ive ever heard of. He not only faked credentials to colleges, but he actually INVENTED colleges that didnt even exist. He claimed to have met the Dalai Lama, when the Dalai Lama was proven to not be there. He claims to have worked with Gene Roddenbery, and written some of the Star Trek series, all of which is false. He claims to be a writer, yet the Writers Guild of America has checked, and he has written NOTHING! Also, he runs a "Company" from his house. On his website, he talks about "Office Staff". His company is his basement, and his "Office Staff" is him and his girlfriend. He IS A TOTAL FAKE!

[Novice]

Paul-
I've read several of your posts prior to this one referencing Sean.  I checked out his website when I read your first post with the link. I do agree with MJ-12 though. I respect your opinion of this man. But there are 3 main things that cause me to question or ignore people like this: using celebrities to sell self; claims of most accurate or most advanced, etc; emphasis on profit/money. And I got bad vibes on each of these 3 things from him.

The first thing that I noticed on his website were all of the photos with 'famous people.' This is a personal thing of mine, but anytime I see someone using famous people to 'support' their validity or impress people, I view that as a big warning sign.

Another personal warning sign of mine is when people profess to be "the most accurate" or to somehow try to quantify their abilities (correct 90% of the time).

And the third peave of mine is when someone implies knowledge of something that sounds very tantalizing, but then wants to charge you for anything further. Or offers to sell you information to help you make money. In my opinion, if money plays an important role in obtaining information or if abilities are used to generate money (like forecasting the lottery or stocks) that's a major red flag in my book.

I realize from reading a number of your posts that you have a high opinion of this man. But I would just like to caution you on how far you 'take' his prophecies. I would also recommend that you listen to your own intuition as well.

I haven't read the watchdog site posted on this thread and I'm not attempting to 'bash him'. I'm merely giving you my own opinions based on what I've read on his website.

Good Luck!

[MJ-12]

hj

[shadowatcher]

If you check out the link I wrote to UFOWATCHDOG.com, you wil realize that apearances can be decieving.Here I quote from UFOWATCHDOG.cOM




Subject: Re: Gene Roddenberry association
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 20:03:27 -0700
From: David Alexander <e-mail address withheld by request>

To: sean@delphiassociates.org

I am curious as to you association with Gene Roddenberry. Where and when did it take place?

Yours truly,
David Alexander






Subject: Re: Gene Roddenberry association
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 16:00:54 EDT
From: Vajra777@aol.com

Dear David,

I worked for Mr. Roddenberry off and on for about 2 years from 1981 to 1983. He bought a project that I had written called THE GUARDIANS, and we all worked on what STAR TREK would eventually become. PARAMONT at the time could not decide whether to make STAR TREK a TV series, a movie series, or aseries of TV movies. Then Hollywood was hit with two crippling strikes by SAGand then the WGA which lasted almost a year, one after the other.

Gene was trying to convince Paramount to form it's own network, which became UPN 20 years later, with Star Trek as the flagship series.

When Paramont decided that Star Trek was to become a series of TV movies, they summerily FIRED Gene and brought on Harve Bennett to produce. Genewent crazy, had a nervous breakdown, and was forcibly escorted off the lot by security.

The movie we all had worked on and set up became WRATH OF KHAN, made forjust under $8 million by the Paramont TV division. The movie was so could it was released theatrically and grossed over $300 million to date. But as the series faltered, Paramount finally approched Gene about bringing Star Trek back to TV as a series, where he then developed ST:TNG.

That may be more info than you need, but I did come up with quite a few ideas that were later used in the series and films like the Holodeck and the Lt. Savik character. In fact PAtrick Stewart was cast because I used to bring my X-MEN comics into the office, which Gene LOVED, and he looked like Charles Xavier----who he is now playing in the movie! Pretty neat, eh!

All the Best

Sean Morton







Subject: Re: Gene Roddenberry association
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 19:32:57 -0700
From: David Alexander <e-mail address withheld by request>
To: Vajra777@aol.com

Dear Sean,

Thanks for the reply. Your story has several problems. First of all when you claim you worked for Gene Paramount had
already decided that Star Trek was to become a series of theatrical films, the indecision about what to do with Star Trek having happened several years earlier. Indeed, a made-for-TV movie was actually halted about 2 weeks before it
was to begin filming so that plans for Star Trek The Motion Picture could go forward. This was in the late 1970s and had followed the development of a Star Trek TV series.

Second - it was not Gene Roddenberry that was pushing Paramount to create a fourth network but a high ranking Paramount executive and it too happened years earlier and the core of the network's offering was to be the previously mentioned Star Trek series. Gene was not fired by Paramount. He produced the first film and fell victim to studio politics which is why Harve Bennett was brought in. The why and the how are well documented. Gene did not have a nervous breakdown and was not
escorted off the lot by security. The creation of ST:TNG is well documented in my book, "Star Trek Creator: The Authorized Biography of Gene Roddenberry," complete with supporting memos that show Gene's reasoning why he chose to involve himself in another series at age 65.

Gene did not hire Patrick Stewart because he looked like an X Men character. Stewart was hired because a Star Trek producer that Gene had confidence in insisted he bring him on board. He fought for him to be hired and won, something Patrick Stewart told me personally and was confirmed to me by the producer and one of Gene's close assistants in the course of researching my book. In the years I knew Gene I never heard him mention your name. At no time in the two and one-half years after his death that I spent researching and writing Gene's authorized biography (a task he chose me to undertake) did I run
across your name. In the Roddenberry archives, on any piece of paper that I examined in his files of letters and memos, in no interview with anyone associated with the writing or the production of the television series or any of the films did I find mention of your name..... and just to make certain, I just spoke with one of Gene's most trusted assistants who was with him before, during, and after the time frame you claimed to have worked for him. He's never heard of you.






Dear David,

Sorry you have problems. I don't have the time or the strength to argue with you. Your time line is off. I appreciate your research and diligence.

All the Best to you sir,

Sean Morton






My "time line" as you phrase it is backed by evidence and research plus a firm friendship with Gene Roddenberry and friendship with a number of his long-time associates and friends, none of whom ever heard of you working with Gene.

The fourth network was the brain child of Barry Diller in the mid-1970s and anyone working at Paramount knows that. By the time of your alledged association with Gene the deal was dead and Diller gone.

What you state simply did not happen when and as you claim it did...matters of fact easily verified by any number of people who were around Gene at the time, many of whom I interviewed. The time line came out of Gene's own memos and was further verified by dozens of interviews with participants in the events. My time line is absolutely accurate.

It is clear that you are trying to establish credibility by riding on the reputation of Gene Roddenberry, who is conveniently for you, not here to refute your nonsense. Should you continue to make such claims I will be happy to refute them publicly and we'll see who has the greater credibility.

David Alexande








If you read that SMALL sample of the expose' on Sean Morton you will see...this guy is a TOTAL fraud.

[no_leaf_clover]

Shadowcatcher -

Why do you need to convince us so badly that Sean Morton is a fake? If you truly believe it, we'll see for ourselves in the years to come. I'm waiting to see if the US is going to invade Syria before I put much thought behind what he's saying.

[Novice]

If you've met him and trust him, I think that's great! And I appreciate the time you've taken to recommend him to others through your posts here.

I think I may have given you the wrong impression from my post. I was not 'judging' him at all. I was merely stating what I perceived about him from his website. I've never met him. I was merely offering a cautionery note on the exuberance over him. And as I said, those things were my opinion only and thus could very easily be wrong.

I do agree that some people judge others for numerous reasons, including 'vibes'. Everyone is different. I try not to judge anyone (not always easy in todays world) period. I don't think I'm qualified to judge anyone and certainly wouldn't want anyone to judge me.  

However, I have always trusted my intuition (its a woman thing[])

[MJ-12]

pzx

[Soulfire]

Hi,

My dad used to listen to Art Bell, and once in a while he would call me in to listen to something because he knew I liked watching the X-files.

The few experiences I had to listen, I got the distinct feeling that he was an outright fraud looking to cash in on sensationalism.  One guest in particular sticks out who called in and sounded terrified, his voice quivered with fear, talked about how he "knew things" and somebody was after him, etc.  I don't know how else to explain it other than to say it felt like two people were voice acting a really bad play together.  His fear and voice tremors started and stopped with illogical timing, the language style of what they were saying sounded like they were both written by one person instead of the spontaneous thoughts of two different people, the sentence structures were too complex and used no contractions when the person was supposedly scared and talking very fast, etc.  Underneath all that however, my instinct just SCREAMED "staged deliberate fraud!" (for both of them, not just the caller).

All this is just my opinion and based on limited exposure, but I just can't take the guy seriously.

--Soulfire

[Soulfire]

quote:Originally posted by pmlonline

OK, I have no problems with using vibs as a guide to finding something. But Karma will be one's middle name if they judge someone based on any amount of vib. That is, if they're not truly in communion with their higher self.

I don't think Karma works like some kind of hell/retribution system to punish a person who makes mistakes.  If you judge somebody for ANY reason (vibe or otherwise), I would suggest that your karma debt is probably paid just by losing the opportunity to have that person become part of your life.  Also I have come to believe any time you judge anything, you are probably judging yourself on some similar level and thus paying a "price" that way as well - although you may not be conscious of it.  

Maybe I'm wrong, but I believe many karma issues are minor and are worked out "gently" in a way that is likely to help you learn something rather than "punish" you.  I don't think Karma tallies up every little mistake you make and saves them all up to hit you over the head with in another life.  At least not unless you have MAJOR issues and that is the only way you will learn.  As with many other things though, BELIEVING it works that way just might make it so.  Just my opinion...

--Soulfire

[shadowatcher]

pmlonline, There are a HUGE number of people who HATE Sean Morton:

1. Star-Trek Fans.

2. Remote viewers and phsycics, who watched as Sean ruined all of their reputations.

3. Ufo watchers, who were given a bad name thanks to Seans wild predictions of aliens taking over the planet.

4. Skeptics...no...wait, Sean was such an idiot he actually made the skeptics happy, by confirming all their worst opinions of physcics.

And many, many, more groups, who have been insulted by Seans Idiocy...I hope he does us all a favor, and prophezises (spelling?) something usefule, like his own death. With his self-proclaimed
"90 PERCENT ACCURACY RATE!" he should have no problem...[}:)]

[shadowatcher]

If your a true Star Trek fan, then you would be outraged by the fact he tried to get famous by claiming a relationship with Gene Roddenberry, when in fact, he is as much related to Gene Roddenberry as I am. That is, none at all.


Maybe I should take a leaf out of Allanons book and yell at you for "Worshipping the devil" (Sean Morton)

[pmlonline]

.