Narrow Path = Passionate Fool?

[James S]

Yes, this shall be looked at.

Innocent unless proven guilty though.

[]
James.

[Kazbadan]

Who is Narrow Path? Why do you speak in a such way has if i has died?

[no_leaf_clover]

Not meant to be any sort of attack on Passionate Fool, but just a comparison and a curiousity...

Is there any chance that Passionate-Fool is Narrow Path, reincarnated on this forum? I have no idea, but I noticed the two were awfully similar in their beliefs and posting and never really seemed to have any sort of conflict with one another, while Narrow Path had a few conflicts with several people, including other Christians.

Aside from the possible IP similarities which would be a dead giveaway(and maybe a moderator has commented on this on a different topic already), there are a couple weird similiarities I noticed about Passionate-Fool and Narrow Path...

First, the most obvious thing: they both preach/defend Christianity in the pressuring manner. You can just read the posts yourself and see what I mean, but supposively they're 'best friends', so this might not be surprising in itself.

Second of all, they both use breaks strangely between paragraphs, as if they are adjusting the post to fit their screen. They sometimes use a one-line break between paragraphs and a two-line break at other times. Here are some examples.

Narrow Path (from 'The Left Hand Path or Satanism'):

quote:Personal Belief, not Universal
Left Hand Path philosophies do not claim that they are the best religion for all people and frequently claim they are only a valid religion for some people. "Satanists are born, not made" Anton LaVey. Satanism and the LHP is striking for the lack of missionizing. This is probably the result of the admission that no religion, philosophy or belief system is suitable for all people.

Notice the way he breaks (or presses enter) after the word 'Universal', as if he is adjusting the post text to fit his screen width, etc.

Passionate-Fool (From 'Judge sentences own son to die for anothers crime'):

quote:I assure you, Jesus and Jehovah are no myth. Have you seen the death of Jesus Christ on the cross in the astral? Have you knelt before the foot of the throne and felt God's awesome prescence thru a lucid dream? NP has seen the former and I have seen the latter. I am not saying this to sound arrogant. I am simply stateing our personal experiences. NP and I have had other spiritual realm experiences outside of Christ as well. None of them have held the Power that
was in Christ. The Power that assures you that you are most definatly not God, but God loves you just the same anyway. It is that Infinite Love made possible thru Jesus, that convinces you God is God. You feel the impossibility of ever returning that Love properly. The feeling of it is almost to me like being struck dumb. You point your mind at the the thought of it as a possibility and the next thing you know you are on your knees in utter awe. These words really can't convey the experience good enough though.

Notice the break between 'that' and 'was', and if it doesn't appear as a break, then just find the original message and look at it. In Passionate-Fool's posts, you find the same strange breaking in the middle of sentences as Narrow Path used. Bit of a coincidence, eh? Hardly anyone else uses such a style of posting. Most people either use a two-line break between paragraphs, or sometimes a consistent one-line break, but the pattern such as Narrow Path/Passionate Fool's is a bit rare.



I'm not saying anything for certain, and I don't mean to get Passionate Fool into being looked at as Narrow Path unless he actually is Narrow Path, and that's all I was wondering.