ki pictures

ssjoku · January 31, 2003, 21:21:42

the reason why i did it in the dark is so that you people could see it clearly

kakkarot · January 31, 2003, 22:00:58

wow.

but i dunno, just like with what you said about psipog, that could have been done in photoshop ... no, i don't really believe that you did it in photoshop. i'm not 100% convinced it is real, since it could have been done in photoshop, but i am about as convinced as i am for any other picture i have seen, because i trust you.

if you say it's real, then i'm willing to believe it. after all, i've seen enough in my life that your pic could be real. which is the reason why i don't instantly believe or disbelieve anything without proof. after all, not many of us have a way of proving the things we say on these forums, so we just have to trust one another.

(skeptic: but if you trust each other, why not use your real names?
me: that's just in case the government comes looking. [

])

thanks for the contribution.

~kakkarot

fredhedd · January 31, 2003, 22:31:36

that's a good picture. i'm assuming it looks like that w/out the camera as well. is that right? have you shown anyone else that, in person?

MJ-12 · January 31, 2003, 22:35:32

bv

ssjoku · January 31, 2003, 22:41:10

it is real
what is photoshop?

auraseer · February 01, 2003, 06:05:32

Hi,
This is going to turn out like the topic on my forum. They said my pics are fake when they aren't.

I believe that the picture is real, because I know myself about how Ki shows up on camera (ki ball pictures topic).

Cya,
auraseer.

Adrian · February 01, 2003, 06:24:55

Greetings Everyone,

I would like to make the observation that digital caemera's, which after all are a fairly recent innovation, do appear to capture images from the etheric zone at least. There have been numerous examples of Orbs being photographed this way, as well as other energetic phenomena.

To demonstrate the point, here is a photograph of a scene, in which several Orbs also appear.

With best regards,

Adrian.

auraseer · February 01, 2003, 09:17:46

Hi,
Wow... Thanks for proving this stuff Adrian.

Cya,
auraseer.

Squeek · February 01, 2003, 11:03:04

Well, i can answer two questions right now!

One: Photoshop is a photo-editing software.

Two: I went to MY editing software and did a ttal rundown of the picture, and i could find to proof that it was doctored in anyway... I reversed the colors, added color to the ball, and blurred, and sharpened, and anything i could do. If anything, it proved it more...

ssjoku · February 01, 2003, 11:21:25

that picture of my is a fake i made it my self look

all i did was take a picture of my speeker light in the dark thats what you can do with technoligy

ssjoku · February 01, 2003, 16:08:29

ill show you guys that levitating is not real ill do the same thing that one guy did in that one movie

kakkarot · February 01, 2003, 16:20:19

you don't need to bother, we already know the trick.

you stand at a 45degree horizontal angle so that people can see one foot but the other foot is hidden by the one they can see. make sure their eyes are about the height of yours, then lift yourself up on the foot that the people can't see.

~kakkarot

Fat_Turkey · February 01, 2003, 16:25:04

Adrian, with all due respect, I'd just like to know where you got that photo? Looks pretty fake to me. I've seen etheric orbs floating around on their own before and they usually are covered in a kind of smoke. See a picture of your typical swirling Japanese ghost for an idea (the eye of the ghost is the orb, the body of the ghost is the smoke).

And that really is easy to believe to the modern ki practitioner. The lack of information on websites leads some energy practitioners to believe that ki is green, and nothing else (see UnderGround Society webpage), and although it looks really cool, I noticed that it gave off light. Energy (whatever you want to call it, ki, chi, psi, etc.) doesn't give off light, but the pic was glowing. That's a main sign that things have been doctored.

Anyways good job with the hoax. Tell me about your halloween pranks [

].

Later
-FT

ssjoku · February 01, 2003, 17:06:43

ok then i wont

Adrian · February 01, 2003, 17:24:14

Greetings!

The orbs photograph was sent to me by a friend in Canada who I can trust completely.

In addition, I have been sent several seperate digital photographs of orbs by totally different people, in totally different situations. The orbs often appear on family photo's e.g. taken at thanksgiving.

All the orb photo's I have seen have been very similar indeed, and no way IMO they can all be fake.

Orbs can indeed appear to be "smokey" or "wispy" as well, but most commonly they appear as per the photo. It would seem that digital photography is capable of capturing the image of beings in the Etheric plane closest to the physical.

"Ghosts" usually manifest in a different way - usually in places with high concentrations of ectoplasm. Ectoplasm tends to build up over the years to higher and higher concentrations - it is "secreted" by living people. That is why you tend to see most instances of "ghost" sightings in old buildings that have been inabited for hundreds fo years, and also in places where many people gather - most notably theatres, libraries etc. - hence the "phantom of the opera" and all that [

]

Materialisation mediums can also be used by souls in the mid to lower Astral by extruding ectoplasm from the medium to either manifest partially or completely - e.g. just a hand or arm - or to use as an etheric voicebox for the "direct voice" medium. In the latter case, the Astral being extrudes ectoplasm connected to the throat chakra of the medium, and that is how the voice from the "other side" is generated.

Orbs, and energetic photographs are not ectoplasmic however, I think that digital photography has the speed and resolution to capture the images in the ether.

With best regards,

Adrian.

ssjoku · February 01, 2003, 17:40:59

adrian that picture is fake

because us canadians are very smart

Risu no Kairu · February 01, 2003, 20:05:58

Actually, digital cameras aren't the best to go ghost hunting with. A lot of those 'orb' pics that digital cameras seem to take so easily is just dust. Digital cameras are really bad and picking up dust. You may not see the dust, and a regular camera may not pick up the dust, but digital cameras and dust become an orb fest.

ssjoku · February 01, 2003, 20:14:54

that is true because when the light leaves the camera it hits the dust it makes the image of and orb

kakkarot · February 01, 2003, 20:47:57

tsk tsk, ssjoku, not all canadians are smart. i've heard a canadian grade 12 physics student ask "which is closer: the moon or the nearest star, not including the sun?" i mean, come on. i could see the first half of the question for someone who was just completely out of touch, but to NOT include our sun? *rolls eyes*.

nationality does not create iq.

~kakkarot

ssjoku · February 01, 2003, 21:20:08

i know not all canadians are smart

auraseer · February 02, 2003, 04:04:49

Hi,
C'mon guys, give Adrian some slack. He has had many years of experience with this stuff, probably more than you. So why would he post a picture that the 'orbs' are of dust? Don't you think he would of figured that out by now?

Cya,
auraseer.

ssjoku · February 04, 2003, 13:44:51

auraseer how is your trianing going what is your power level

LMAO

Squeek · February 04, 2003, 14:14:57

That's not nice..........

more [

]

ssjoku · February 04, 2003, 14:38:14

thats not mean i just ask how his trianing going

LMAO

PeacefulWarrior · February 04, 2003, 14:58:15

I simply cannot understand the seeming obsession over these things...

It reminds me of a sotry that Paramahansa Yogananda told of a master in India who could do all kinds of little "miracles", ie. make things appear, make scents, etc. In the end he was shunned by the true masters who didn't see any real good, practical, useful spiritual truths being taught to the followers. It's more carnivalesque than anything else...and really a dangerous waste of time and resources.

News:

ki pictures