It just seems to me that using race/gender as a basis for anything is wrong.
"Now, after all this work defending Affirmative Action, I'm going to suggest a COMPROMISE! A progressive upward-mobility program based upon socioeconomic status. It could start out as race-neutral, until/unless it became evident that all benefits were going to poor whites, which would be a MAJOR red flag because the poor in the U.S. are generally non-white, at least in urban areas. Applicants would still have to be high-qualified, or in the case of the very young, high-potential.
Guys/gals, work with me on this. What do you think? "
To me basing benefit programs more on this line of thinking would be more level.
"Now, after all this work defending Affirmative Action, I'm going to suggest a COMPROMISE! A progressive upward-mobility program based upon socioeconomic status. It could start out as race-neutral, until/unless it became evident that all benefits were going to poor whites, which would be a MAJOR red flag because the poor in the U.S. are generally non-white, at least in urban areas. Applicants would still have to be high-qualified, or in the case of the very young, high-potential.
Guys/gals, work with me on this. What do you think? "
To me basing benefit programs more on this line of thinking would be more level.